Labels

1IMP 2IMP Abu Simbel Abusir Abydos Aegean Afterlife books agriculture Alexandria Amarna Amduat amulets animals Archaeology architecture art astronomy Asyut Atfih Avaris Beni Hassan Bible bibliography biology boats body-soul Book of the Dead Bubastis Buhen calenders ceramics chronology climate Coffin Texts coffins conservation Coptic coregency cosmology cult Dahshur daily life Deir el Gebrâwi Deir el Medina deities Demotic Dendera dictionary domestic life dress Early Dynastic East Desert economy Edfu egyptology El Bersheh El Kab embalming encyclopedia epigraphy erasures ethnicity excavations Fayum festivals figurines funerary beliefs furniture gender general and popular geography GIS Giza graffiti Greco-Roman health hermetism Hermopolis Hieraconpolis hieratic hieroglyphs history international relations journals juridical Karnak Khufu king-lists kingship kinship Kom Ombo KV. Lahun landscape Late Period lecture (video) letters Levant Libya literature Luxor magic materials mathematics Medinet Habu Meir Memphis Menkaure Mesopotamia Middle Kingdom Mo'alla mummies museums music mythology names Naqada New Kingdom nilometer Nubia numismatics oasis Old Kingdom osteoarchaeology ostraca papyri Papyrology personal piety Philae philology photo archive pigments poetry predynastic priesthood Punt pyramid temples Pyramid Texts pyramids quarries Queenship Ramesseum reception history Red Sea religion rituals rock art Saqqara Sarapeum sculpture Seti 1 settlements shipping social organisation social relations Sphinx stelae syncretism temples textiles texts Thebes thechnology titles tombs tourist guide trade transport travels TT Tutankhamon urbanity ushabti warfare West desert wisdom texts writing

Saturday, March 3, 2012

James: Herihor’s Kingship and the High Priest of Amun Piankh

James, P. and Morkot, R., 2010.
“Herihor’s Kingship and the High Priest of Amun Piankh”, 
Journal of Egyptian History 3:2, 231-260.
http://www.centuries.co.uk/herihors-kingship.pdf
"The theory of Jansen-Winkeln, which argues for a reversal of the traditional order of the late 20th-dynasty High Priests of Amun Herihor and Piankh, has provoked considerable controversy. The key to a resolution seems to lie in recognising that Herihor, on his elevation to kingship, was able (like later monarchs of the TIP) to co-opt a colleague/relative as High Priest of Amun. This way Piankh’s pontificate can be placed within the reign of King Herihor, explaining the genealogical and other evidence which might otherwise suggest a reversal of the two but avoiding the pitfalls of Jansen-Winkeln’s case. The evidence suggests a shortening of the high priestly genealogy at this period by one to two generations (from the standard/Kitchen model). A first step is offered here towards a new model involving a short overlap between the 20th and 21st dynasties, as well as between Herihor and Pinudjem I, as Upper Egyptian kings based at Thebes."

No comments:

Post a Comment