Labels

1IMP 2IMP Abu Simbel Abusir Abydos Aegean Afterlife books Alexandria Amarna Amduat Archaeology Asyut Atfih Avaris Beni Hassan Bible Book of the Dead Bubastis Buhen Coffin Texts Coptic Dahshur Deir el Gebrâwi Deir el Medina Demotic Dendera Early Dynastic East Desert Edfu El Bersheh El Kab Fayum GIS Giza Greco-Roman Hermopolis Hieraconpolis KV. Karnak Khufu Kom Ombo Lahun Late Period Levant Libya Luxor Medinet Habu Meir Memphis Menkaure Mesopotamia Middle Kingdom Mo'alla Naqada New Kingdom Nubia Old Kingdom Papyrology Philae Punt Pyramid Texts Queenship Ramesseum Red Sea Saqqara Sarapeum Seti 1 Sphinx TT Thebes Tutankhamon West desert agriculture amulets animals architecture art astronomy bibliography biology boats body-soul calenders ceramics chronology climate coffins conservation coregency cosmology cult daily life deities dictionary domestic life dress economy egyptology embalming encyclopedia epigraphy erasures ethnicity excavations festivals figurines funerary beliefs furniture gender general and popular geography graffiti health hermetism hieratic hieroglyphs history international relations journals juridical king-lists kingship kinship landscape lecture (video) letters literature magic materials mathematics mummies museums music mythology names nilometer numismatics oasis osteoarchaeology ostraca papyri personal piety philology photo archive pigments poetry predynastic priesthood pyramid temples pyramids quarries reception history religion rituals rock art sculpture settlements shipping social organisation social relations stelae syncretism temples textiles texts thechnology titles tombs tourist guide trade transport travels urbanity ushabti warfare wisdom texts writing

Friday, September 16, 2011

Sanders (ed.):Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures

OIS 2. Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures.
Seth L. Sanders, ed.
2005.
Oriental Institute Seminars 2
Writing and the state both first began in the ancient Near East. The origins of history are traced to the place where they met. But what did they actually have to do with each other? Most of ancient Near Eastern philology consists of careful examination of the leavings of the state scribes; it has revealed a treasure-house of ancient culture, from haunting poetry to onion archives. But there is a crucial blind spot in our perspective on the largest and oldest archive of the ancient world: the relationship between the vast body of official writing and the actual life of language as spoken, understood, and imagined by ancient Near Eastern people. The vital relationships between language and ethnicity, the connections between languages of empire and local identity, and way languages are born, live and die in writing has remained the subject of more speculation than rigorous research. If recorded history began in the ancient Near East, we are just beginning to explore the powerful creative relationship between writing and the political identities of the Near East’s cultures. Collectively, the articles here provide well-documented challenges to conventional wisdom about that for which people actually used Sumerian, Egyptian, Hittite, and Hebrew. This conference was the first to bring leading philologists together with anthropologists and social theorists to explore what writing meant to politics in the ancient Near East. The conference was designed to encourage philologists to talk to theorists about how their material matters. It seems to have worked. The papers and responses give a vivid sense of the stakes and consequences of the oldest written texts in the twenty-first century.

No comments:

Post a Comment