Labels

1IMP 2IMP Abu Simbel Abusir Abydos Aegean Afterlife books agriculture Alexandria Amarna Amduat amulets animals Archaeology architecture art astronomy Asyut Atfih Avaris Beni Hassan Bible bibliography biology boats body-soul Book of the Dead Bubastis Buhen calenders ceramics chronology climate Coffin Texts coffins conservation Coptic coregency cosmology cult Dahshur daily life Deir el Gebrâwi Deir el Medina deities Demotic Dendera dictionary domestic life dress Early Dynastic East Desert economy Edfu egyptology El Bersheh El Kab embalming encyclopedia epigraphy erasures ethnicity excavations Fayum festivals figurines funerary beliefs furniture gender general and popular geography GIS Giza graffiti Greco-Roman health hermetism Hermopolis Hieraconpolis hieratic hieroglyphs history international relations journals juridical Karnak Khufu king-lists kingship kinship Kom Ombo KV. Lahun landscape Late Period lecture (video) letters Levant Libya literature Luxor magic materials mathematics Medinet Habu Meir Memphis Menkaure Mesopotamia Middle Kingdom Mo'alla mummies museums music mythology names Naqada New Kingdom nilometer Nubia numismatics oasis Old Kingdom osteoarchaeology ostraca papyri Papyrology personal piety Philae philology photo archive pigments poetry predynastic priesthood Punt pyramid temples Pyramid Texts pyramids quarries Queenship Ramesseum reception history Red Sea religion rituals rock art Saqqara Sarapeum sculpture Seti 1 settlements shipping social organisation social relations Sphinx stelae syncretism temples textiles texts Thebes thechnology titles tombs tourist guide trade transport travels TT Tutankhamon urbanity ushabti warfare West desert wisdom texts writing

Friday, September 16, 2011

Sanders (ed.):Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures

OIS 2. Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures.
Seth L. Sanders, ed.
2005.
Oriental Institute Seminars 2
Writing and the state both first began in the ancient Near East. The origins of history are traced to the place where they met. But what did they actually have to do with each other? Most of ancient Near Eastern philology consists of careful examination of the leavings of the state scribes; it has revealed a treasure-house of ancient culture, from haunting poetry to onion archives. But there is a crucial blind spot in our perspective on the largest and oldest archive of the ancient world: the relationship between the vast body of official writing and the actual life of language as spoken, understood, and imagined by ancient Near Eastern people. The vital relationships between language and ethnicity, the connections between languages of empire and local identity, and way languages are born, live and die in writing has remained the subject of more speculation than rigorous research. If recorded history began in the ancient Near East, we are just beginning to explore the powerful creative relationship between writing and the political identities of the Near East’s cultures. Collectively, the articles here provide well-documented challenges to conventional wisdom about that for which people actually used Sumerian, Egyptian, Hittite, and Hebrew. This conference was the first to bring leading philologists together with anthropologists and social theorists to explore what writing meant to politics in the ancient Near East. The conference was designed to encourage philologists to talk to theorists about how their material matters. It seems to have worked. The papers and responses give a vivid sense of the stakes and consequences of the oldest written texts in the twenty-first century.

No comments:

Post a Comment